RLB3.COM

Aut disce aut discede

Git merging by example

Posted by rlb3 Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:36:00 GMT

Posted in | no comments |

Git - a Talk by Randal Schwartz

Posted by rlb3 Tue, 06 May 2008 18:52:00 GMT

Posted in | no comments |

Using git to deploy your rails apps

Posted by rlb3 Tue, 06 May 2008 13:44:00 GMT

Posted in | no comments |

Git on leopard

Posted by rlb3 Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:20:00 GMT

I you are trying to install the latest git on leopard. You must add NO_MSGFMT=1 to your make line for it compile properly.

Posted in | no comments |

svn vs {git,bzr,hg,blablabla} - journal zen - par Vincent

Posted by rlb3 Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:34:00 GMT

More "discussion":http://www.vuntz.net/journal/2007/09/10/446-svn-vs-gitbzrhgblablabla of gnome moving to git

Posted in | no comments |

Git on Floss Weekly

Posted by rlb3 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:16:00 GMT

Git is rising in popularity. This last weeks "Floss weekly":http://www.twit.tv/floss19 topic was "git":http://git.or.cz/

Posted in | no comments |

Linus on subversion and git

Posted by rlb3 Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:18:00 GMT

Linus: I like making strong statements, because I find the discussion interesting. In other words, I actually tend to 'like' arguing. Not mindlessly, but I certainly tend to prefer the discussion a bit more heated, and not just entirely platonic.

And making strong arguments occasionally ends up resulting in a very valid rebuttal, and then I'll happily say: "Oh, ok, you're right."

But no, that didn't happen on SVN/CVS. I suspect a lot of people really don't much like CVS, so I didn't really even expect anybody to argue that CVS was really anything but a legacy system. And while I've gotten a few people who argued that I shouldn't have been quite so impolite against SVN (and hey, that's fair -- I'm really not a very polite person!), I don't think anybody actually argued that SVN was 'good'.

SVN is, I think, a classic case of 'good enough'. It's what people are used to, and it's 'good enough' to be used fairly widely, but it's good enough in exactly the sense DOS and Windows were 'good enough'. Not great technology, just very widely available, and it works well enough for people and looks familiar enough that people use it. But very few people are 'proud' of it, or excited about it.

Git, on the other hand, has some of the 'UNIX philosophy' behind it. Not that it is about UNIX, per se, but like original UNIX, it had a fundamental idea behind it. For UNIX, the underlying philosophy was/is that, "Everything is a file." For git, it's, Everything is just an object in the content-addressable database."

Copied from "here":http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=273761&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=20285299

Posted in | no comments |

Git - Stuipd content tracker

Posted by rlb3 Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:20:00 GMT

For those that haven't tried, please try "git":http://git.or.cz/. I think you will find it a great source code management system. For those who say that its harder the subverson, get over it. It's not that much harder and the benefits out way any inconvenience of learning the new commands. Here is an "article":http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter/ that talks about some of the not so obvious features of git.

Posted in | no comments |